Redacción de manuscritos convincentes para revistas médicas revisadas por pares: redacción de un artículo de revisión sistemática.
Resumen
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referencias
Khalid Khan, R. K., Jos Kleijnen, Gerd Antes (29 Julio 2011). Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine, 2nd edition: CRC Press.
García-Molina, L., Lewis-Mikhael, A. M., Riquelme-Gallego, B., CanoIbáñez, N., Oliveras-López, M. J., & Bueno-Cavanillas, A. (2020). Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus glycaemic control through lifestyle modification implementing diet intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nutr, 59(4), 1313-1328. doi:10.1007/s00394-019-02147-6
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1997). Meta-Analysis. Potentials and promise. Bmj, 315(7119), 1371-1374. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1371
Aromataris E, F. R., Godfrey C, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. (2020). Chapter 10: Umbrella Reviews. In M. Z. Aromataris E (Ed.), JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis
Hartling, L., Chisholm, A., Thomson, D., & Dryden, D. M. (2012). A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011. PLoS One, 7(11), e49667. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049667
Chien, P. F., Khan, K. S., & Siassakos, D. (2012). Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO. Bjog, 119(8), 903-905. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03242.x
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., .Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med, 151(4), W65-94. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
Gallo, V., Egger, M., McCormack, V., Farmer, P. B., Ioannidis, J. P., Kirsch-Volders, M., . Vineis, P. (2011). STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology - Molecular Epidemiology (STROBEME): an extension of the STROBE statement. Prev Med, 53(6), 377-387. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.007
Shokeir, A. A. (2014). How to write a medical original article: Advice from an Editor. Arab J Urol, 12(1), 71-78. doi:10.1016/j.aju.2013.10.006
Khan, K. S., & Coomarasamy, A. (2004). Searching for evidence to inform clinical practice. Current Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 14(2),
-146. doi:10.1016/j.curobgyn.2003.12.006
Díaz-Burrueco, J. R., Cano-Ibáñez, N., Martín-Peláez, S., Khan, K. S., & Amezcua-Prieto, C. Effects on the maternal-fetal health outcomes of various physical activity types in healthy pregnant women. A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.030
Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., Thacker, S. B. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.Jama, 283(15), 2008-2012. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Khan, K. S. (2006). The architecture of evidence-based gynaecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20(5),
-646. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.03.001
Coomarasamy, A., Latthe, P., Papaioannou, S., Publicover, M., Gee, H., & Khan, K. S. (2001). Critical appraisal in clinical practice: sometimes irrelevant, occasionally invalid. J R Soc Med, 94(11), 573-577. doi:10.1177/014107680109401105
Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or nonrandomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. Bmj, 358, j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011). The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public
involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 27(4), 391-399. doi:10.1017/s0266462311000481
Martínez, I. A. (2005). Native and non-native writers’ use of first person pronouns in the different sections of biology research articles in English. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 174-190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.06.001
Jenicek, M. (2006). How to read, understand, and write 'Discussion' sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking. Med Sci Monit, 12(6), Sr28-36.
Rogerio Faria, V., Renan Cardoso de, L., & Eduardo Seiti Gomide, M. (2019). How to write the discussion section of a scientific article. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 41(1). doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.42621
Gee, K. S. K. H. (1999). A new approach to teaching and learning in journal club. Medical Teacher, 21(3), 289-293. doi:10.1080/01421599979554
Maes-Carballo, M., Muñoz-Núñez, I., Martín-Díaz, M., Mignini, L., BuenoCavanillas, A., & Khan, K. S. (2020). Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review. Health Expect, 23(5), 1045-1064. doi:10.1111/hex.13112
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med, 3(3), e123-130.
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., . Khalil, H. (2020). Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth, 18(10), 2119-2126. doi:10.11124/jbies-20-00167
Van Zuuren, E. J., & Fedorowicz, Z. (2016). Moose on the loose: checklist for meta-analyses of observational studies. Br J Dermatol, 175(5), 853-854. doi:10.1111/bjd.15038
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.53766/AcBio/Se encuentra actualmente indizada en: | |||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
Todos los documentos publicados en esta revista se distribuyen bajo una
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución -No Comercial- Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional.
Por lo que el envío, procesamiento y publicación de artículos en la revista es totalmente gratuito.