Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
Inteligencia artificial y sus aplicaciones en ortodoncia - Una revisión
Resumen
INTRODUCCIÓN: Las últimas décadas hemos percibido variaciones masivas en nuestra profesión. La llegada de nuevas opciones estéticas en ortodoncia, el cambio hacia un flujo de trabajo completamente digital, el desarrollo de dispositivos de anclaje temporal y nuevos métodos de obtención de imágenes ofrecen tanto a los pacientes como a los profesionales un enfoque novedoso en el cuidado de la ortodoncia. OBJETIVO: Esta revisión tiene como objetivo proporcionar una visión general de la evidencia existente sobre el uso de inteligencia artificial (IA), aprendizaje automático (ML) y su traducción a la práctica clínica de ortodoncia. Su objetivo es determinar las aplicaciones de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) en el campo de la Ortodoncia, evaluar sus beneficios y discutir sus potenciales implicaciones en esta especialidad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: La literatura para este artículo fue identificada y seleccionada mediante una búsqueda exhaustiva en bases de datos electrónicas como PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science publicadas durante las últimas dos décadas (enero de 2000 - diciembre de 2021). RESULTADOS: La IA se implementa ampliamente en una amplia gama de ortodoncia para predecir las extracciones de ortodoncia necesarias para los tratamientos de ortodoncia. Los análisis y la detección automatizados de puntos de referencia, la evaluación del crecimiento y el desarrollo, el diagnóstico y la planificación del tratamiento fueron los más comúnmente estudiados. CONCLUSIÓN: Ha habido un aumento exponencial en el número de estudios que involucran diversas aplicaciones de ortodoncia de inteligencia artificial y aprendizaje automático. La IA también puede mejorar la precisión de los tratamientos de ortodoncia, ayudando así al ortodoncista a trabajar de forma más precisa y eficiente.
Recibido: 29/11/2024
Aceptado: 03/01/2025
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referencias
Ramesh, A. N., Kambhampati, C., Monson, J. R. T., Drew, P. J. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2004, 86(5), 334–338.
Turing AM. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind; 1950, 59: 433–60.
Shapiro, S. C. Encyclopaedia of Artificial Intelligence. 1992, 2nd ed., Vols. 1 and 2.New York, Wiley.
Vashisht Anu and Choudhary Ekta. “Artificial intelligence; mutating dentistry”. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews 6.1 (2019).
Lusted LB. Medical progress – medical electronics. N Engl J Med; 1955, 252: 580–5.
Jung MH. Factors influencing treatment efficiency: a prospective cohort study. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(1):1-8.
S. B. Khanagar et al., “Developments, application, and performance of artificial intelligence in dentistry – A systematic review,” Journal of Dental Sciences, Jun. 2020.
M. L. Brodie, “What Is Data Science?” Applied Data Science, pp. 101–130, 2019.
Y. Riahi and S. Riahi, “Big Data and Big Data Analytics: concepts, types and technologies,” International Journal of Research and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 524–528, Nov. 2018.
Xie Xiaoqiu., et al. “Artificial neural network modelling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment”. The Angle Orthodontist 80.2 (2010): 262-266.
Birnbaum Nathan S and Heidi B Aaronson. “Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality”. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 29.8 (2008): 494-496.
Mackin N., et al. “Artificial intelligence in the dental surgery: an orthodontic expert system, a dental tool of tomorrow”. Dental Update 18.8 (1991): 341.
Li Peilin., et al. “Orthodontic treatment planning based on artificial neural networks”. Scientific Reports 9.1 (2019): 1-9.
Thanathornwong B. Bayesian-based decision support system for assessing the needs for orthodontic treatment. Healthc Inform Res 2018; 24:22e8.
34.Lee KS, Jung SK, Ryu JJ, Shin SW, Choi J. Evaluation of transfer learning with deep convolutional neural networks for screening osteoporosis in dental panoramic radiographs. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):392.
Hwang JJ, Lee JH, Han SS, Kim YH, Jeong HG, Choi YJ, et al. Strut analysis for osteoporosis detection model using dental panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(7):20170006. Epub 2017 Jul 14
Yeom SH, Na JS, Jung HD, Cho HJ, Choi YJ, Lee JS. Computational analysis of airflow dynamics for predicting collapsible sites in the upper airways: machine learning approach. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019;127(4):959–73. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Skotko BG, Macklin EA, Muselli M, Voelz L, McDonough ME, Davidson E, et al. A predictive model for obstructive sleep apnea and Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(4):889 –96. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Dunbar AC, Bearn D, McIntyre G. The influence of using digital diagnostic information on orthodontic treatment planning - a pilot study. J Health Eng. 2014;5(4):411-428.
Xie X, Wang LWA. Artificial neural network modelling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(2):262-266.
Jung SK, Kim Ansan TW. New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2016;149(1):127-133.
Choi HI, Jung SK, Baek SH, et al. Artificial intelligent model with neural network machine learning for the diagnosis of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(7):1986-1989.
Li P, Kong D, Tang T, Su D, Yang P, Wang H, et al. Orthodontic treatment planning based on artificial neural networks. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2037.
Lee JH, Yu HJ, Kim MJ, Kim JW, Choi J. Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1-1.
Hwang HW, Park JH, Moon JH, et al. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: Part 2-Might it be better than human? Angle Orthod. 2020;90(1):69-76
Kim H, Shim E, Park J, Kim YJ, Lee U, Kim Y. Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis by deep learning. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020; 194:105513.
Dobratulin K, Gaidel A, Aupova I, Ivleva A, Kapishnikov A, Zelter P. The efficiency of deep learning algorithms for detecting anatomical reference points on radiological images of the head profile. arXiv. 2020;01135(18):0-5.
Lee JH, Yu HJ, Kim MJ, Kim JW, Choi J. Automated cephalometric landmark detection with confidence regions using Bayesian convolutional neural networks. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):1-10.
Guo Y-C, Han M, Chi Y, et al. Accurate age classification using manual method and deep convolutional neural network based on orthopantomogram images. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(4):1589-159.
Yu HJ, Cho SR, Kim MJ, Kim WH, Kim JW, Choi J. Automated skeletal classification with lateral cephalometry based on artificial intelligence. J Dent Res. 2020;99(3):249–56. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
Mario MC, Abe JM, Ortega NR, Del Santo M Jr. Paraconsistent artificial neural network as auxiliary in cephalometric diagnosis. Artif Organs. 2010;34(7): E215–21.
Yu HJ, Cho SR, Kim MJ, Kim WH, Kim JW, Choi J. Automated skeletal classification with lateral cephalometry based on artificial intelligence. J Dent Res. 2020;99(3):249–56.
Kunz F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Zeman F, Boldt J. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics: evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network. J Orofac Orthop. 2020;81(1):52-68.
Nishimoto S, Sotsuka Y, Kawai K, Ishise H, Kakibuchi M. Personal computerbased cephalometric landmark detection with deep learning, using cephalograms on the internet. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(1):91–5.
Vucinic P, Trpovski Z, Scepan I. Automatic landmarking of cephalograms using active appearance models. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(3):233–41.
Rueda S, Alcañiz M. An approach for the automatic cephalometric landmark detection using mathematical morphology and active appearance models. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 1):159–66.
Grau V, Alcañiz M, Juan MC, Monserrat C, Knoll C. Automatic localization of cephalometric Landmarks. J Biomed Inform. 2001;34(3):146–56.
Kim H, Shim E, Park J, Kim YJ, Lee U, Kim Y. Web-based fully automated cephalometric analysis by deep learning. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020; 194:105513.
Tanikawa C, Yagi M, Takada K. Automated cephalometry: system performance reliability using landmark-dependent criteria. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(6):1037 –46
Neelapu BC, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, Gupta A, Vasamsetti S, Balachandran R, et al. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018;47(2):20170054.
Tanikawa C, Yamamoto T, Yagi M, Takada K. Automatic recognition of anatomic features on cephalograms of preadolescent children. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(5):812 –20.
Ma Q, Kobayashi E, Fan B, Nakagawa K, Sakuma I, Masamune K, et al. Automatic 3D landmarking model using patch-based deep neural networks for CT image of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2020;16(3): e2093. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2093 Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Montúfar J, Romero M, Scougall-Vilchis RJ. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154(1):140–50. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.028.
Montúfar J, Romero M, Scougall-Vilchis RJ. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(3):449–58. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.028.
Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, Balachandran R, Sardana HK. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledgebased landmark detection algorithm. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016; 11(7):1297–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1334-7 Epub 2015 Dec 24.
Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, Balachandran R, Sardana HK. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 10(11):1737–52.
Ed-Dhahraouy M, Riri H, Ezzahmouly M, Bourzgui F, El Moutaoukkil A. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: a pilot study. Int Orthod. 2018;16(2):328 –37.
Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
Chen S, Wang L, Li G, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: introducing a 3D auto-segmentation and auto-landmark finder of CBCT images to assess maxillary constriction in unilateral impacted canine patients. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(1):77-8.
Kim I, Misra D, Rodriguez L, et al. Malocclusion classification on 3D cone-beam CT craniofacial images using multi-channel deep learning models. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020;1294-1298.
Lin G, Kim PJ, Baek SH, Kim HG, Kim SW, Chung JH. Early prediction of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate using machine learning and longitudinal lateral cephalometric analysis data. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):616-620.
Murata S, Lee C, Tanikawa C, Date S. Towards a fully automated diagnostic system for orthodontic treatment in dentistry. Proc - 13th IEEE Int Conf eScience, eScience. 2017;1-8.
Dallora AL, Anderberg P, Kvist O, Mendes E, Ruiz SD, Berglund JS. Bone age assessment with various machine learning techniques: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(7):1-22.
Amasya H, Cesur E, Yildirim DOK. Validation of cervical vertebral maturation stages: artificial intelligence vs human observer visual analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2020;158(6):173-179.
Guo Y-C, Han M, Chi Y, et al. Accurate age classification using manual method and deep convolutional neural network based on orthopantomogram images. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(4):1589-1597.
Kök H, Acilar AM, Izgi MS. Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):41.
Wang X, Cai B, Cao Y, Zhou C, Yang L, Liu R, et al. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: an eye-tracking study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(4):601–10.
Kim BM, Kang BY, Kim HG, Baek SH. Prognosis prediction for class III malocclusion treatment by feature wrapping method. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(4):683–91
Thanathornwong B. Bayesian-based decision support system for assessing the needs for orthodontic treatment. Healthc Inform Res. 2018;24(1):22–8.
Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, Balachandran R, Sardana HK. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015; 10(11):1737–52
Thanathornwong B. Bayesian-based decision support system for assessing the needs for orthodontic treatment. Healthc Inform Res. 2018;24(1):22–8.
Wang X, Cai B, Cao Y, Zhou C, Yang L, Liu R, et al. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: an eye-tracking study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(4):601–10.
Auconi P, Scazzocchio M, Cozza P, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Prediction of class III treatment outcomes through orthodontic data mining. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(3):257–67.
Auconi P, Caldarelli G, Scala A, Ierardo G, Polimeni A. A network approach to orthodontic diagnosis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14(4):189 –97.
Xie X, Wang L, Wang A. Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2010; 80:262-6.
Sun D, Pei Y, Song G, et al. Tooth Segmentation and Labelling from Digital Dental Casts. In: 2020 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)IEEE; 2020: p. 669-673.
Patcas R, Timofte R, Volokitin A, Agustsson E, Eliades T, Eichenberger M, et al. Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(4):428–33.
Patcas R, Bernini DAJ, Volokitin A, Agustsson E, Rothe R, Timofte R. Applying artificial intelligence to assess the impact of orthognathic treatment on facial attractiveness and estimated age. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48(1): 77–83.
Choi HI, Jung SK, Baek SH, Lim WH, Ahn SJ, Yang IH, et al. Artificial intelligent model with neural network machine learning for the diagnosis of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(7):1986–9
Lux CJ, Stellzig A, Volz D, Jäger W, Richardson A, Komposch G. A neural network approach to the analysis and classification of human craniofacial growth. Growth Dev Aging. 1998;62(3):95–106.
Niño-Sandoval TC, Guevara Pérez SV, González FA, Jaque RA, Infante-Contreras C. Use of automated learning techniques for predicting mandibular morphology in skeletal class I, II and III. Forensic Sci Int. 2017; 281:187. e1–7.
Niño-Sandoval TC, Guevara Perez SV, González FA, Jaque RA, InfanteContreras C. An automatic method for skeletal patterns classification using craniomaxillary variables on a Colombian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2016261:159. e1-159.e6.
Laurenziello M, Montaruli G, Gallo C, Tepedino M, Guida L, Perillo L, et al. Determinants of maxillary canine impaction: retrospective clinical and radiographic study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(11):e1304–9.
Nieri M, Crescini A, Rotundo R, Baccetti T, Cortellini P, Pini Prato GP. Factors affecting the clinical approach to impacted maxillary canines: a Bayesian network analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):755–62.
Chen S, Wang L, Li G, Wu TH, Diachina S, Tejera B, et al. Machine learning in orthodontics: introducing a 3D auto-segmentation and auto-landmark finder of CBCT images to assess maxillary constriction in unilateral impacted canine patients. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(1):77 –84.
Laurenziello M, Montaruli G, Gallo C, Tepedino M, Guida L, Perillo L, et al. Determinants of maxillary canine impaction: retrospective clinical and radiographic study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(11): e1304–9.
Nieri M, Crescini A, Rotundo R, Baccetti T, Cortellini P, Pini Prato GP. Factors affecting the clinical approach to impacted maxillary canines: a Bayesian network analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(6):755–62.
Akçam MO, Takada K. Fuzzy modelling for selecting headgear types. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(1):99–106
16.Murray T., Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: an analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education; 1999, 10: 98-129.
Crowley R, Medvedeva O., An intelligent tutoring sys- tem for visual classification problem solving. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine; 2006, 36: 85-117.
Kazi H, Haddawy P, Suebnukarn S. Leveraging a domain ontology to increase the quality of feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems; 14-18; Pittsburgh, USA. New York: Springer, 2010.
Yau HT, Tsou LS, Tsai MJ. Octree-based virtual dental training system with a haptic device. Computer-Aided Design & Applications; 2006, 3: 415-424.
Creation of a virtual dental patient. Accessed (2011 Jan 15) at: http://poseidon.csd.auth.gr/LAB_RESEARCH/ Latest/VirtRealMedicine.htm
Feeney L, Reynolds PA, Eaton KA, Harper J. A description of the new technologies used in transforming dental education. British Dental Journal; 2008, 204: 19-28.
Aksakalli S, Demir A, Selek M, Tasdemir S. Temperature increase during orthodontic bonding with different curing units using an infrared camera. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(1):36–41.
He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, Xu J, Zhou X, Zhang K. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):30-6.
Redman TC. If your data is bad, your machine learning tools are useless. Harv Bus Rev. 2018;2 April. Available: https://hbr. org/2018/04/if-your-data-is-bad-your-machine-learning-tools-are-useless (accessed 2019 June 12).
Murphy KP. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2012. 32. Ferro AS, Nicholson K, Koka S. Innovative trends in implant dentistry training and education: a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1618.
Software as medical device (SaMD). Maryland: United States Food & Drug Administration; 2018.
DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.53766/AcBio/Se encuentra actualmente indizada en: | |||
 |  |  |  |
  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
 |  | ||
Todos los documentos publicados en esta revista se distribuyen bajo una
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución -No Comercial- Compartir Igual 4.0 Internacional.
Por lo que el envío, procesamiento y publicación de artículos en la revista es totalmente gratuito.